Sustainable processing and coloration of textiles
by Dystar Ecology
Solutions.Background
As was indicated in the first publication in this series of
articles on sustainability, with the increasing global
consumption of manufacturing goods, product manufacturing
systems have come under intense scrutiny with regard to their
impact on the environment. It is therefore imperative that the
textile industry address such issues as it is one of the most
polluting manufacturing industries in the world. At every stage
of textile production, large amounts of energy, clean water and
chemicals are used to process the textiles and apparel which we
consumers demand.
In turn these processes generate air, water and soil
pollution through often-untreated effluent disposal and waste
generation which place a heavy burden on the environment.
DyStar has always been committed to the highest standards of
product safety and ecology and to the development of products
and processes offering Best Available Technology with reduced
environmental impact to textile processors. Through its
econfidence® program described in outline in the first paper in
this series DyStar is making expertise in dye chemistry,
ecology, and process know-how available to all parts of the
textile supply chain.
In order to achieve reduced load on environment, we need to
optimize and standardize the entire supply chain and resources.
DyStar, as a responsible player in the field of textile
coloration, has been working in this direction for a long time.
The details were given in an earlier article in this series.
In this article we focus on the coloration processes using Best
Available Technology from DyStar to maximize output with minimum
impact on the environment. Specifically we look at the two major
fibers processed today and show how the application of BAT and
advanced process optimization can minimize resource use and
pollution load.
- Exhaust dyeing of cellulosic fibers with reactive dyes.
- Exhaust dyeing of polyester with disperse dyes.
1. Exhaust dyeing of cellulosic
fibers with reactive dyes
The main effluent control parameters of textile dye house
wastewater include volume, total dissolved solids, chemical
oxygen demand (COD), biological oxygen demand (BOD), colour and
pH. Each is quantifiable and in many industrialised countries
concentration or total load limits are established which may not
be exceeded in effluent discharge to either independently
operated waste water treatment plants (WWTP) or to surface
waters. The permitted limits for discharge to a WWTP are
typically higher than those allowed for surface waters such as
rivers and lakes.
However perhaps the single most important focus for
coloration of cellulosic fibres is the elimination of
nonconformance by using reactive dye technology engineered to
support Right-First-Time production incorporating laboratory to
bulk transferability and production lot repeatability.
For medium to deep shades the impact on the environment can
be significantly reduced by exploiting the unique properties of
the Remazol® Ultra RGB reactive dyes.
The key targets of the Remazol Ultra RGB development
programme were:
- High tinctorial strength of the individual dyes
- High degree of fixation on the cellulosic fibre
- Minimised dye-dye interaction which causes ‘blocking’.
Blocking is typical in many commodity reactive dye
combinations based on a golden yellow, red and navy/black
reactive dye ternary leading to poor reproducibility and
overloading of dye in an attempt to reach the desired depth of
shade. Dye overload results in poor Right-First-Time
performance, very low fixation efficiency and consequently a
high pollution load in the dye house effluent due to unfixed dye
hydrolysis.
The high build-up of the Remazol Ultra RGB dyes may be
observed in the Diagram 1 and
Diagram 2:
|

Diagram 1: Build up of Remazol Ultra
Orange RGB and Remazol Ultra Yellow RGBN vs. C.I. Reactive
Yellow 176 |
|

Diagram 2: Build up of Remazol Ultra
Carmine RGB and Remazol Ultra Red RGB vs. C.I. Reactive
Red 239 |
The key to avoiding dye overload is to form the covalent
bonds with the cellulose fibre at a percentage of dye
application where the graph is steep, because the rate of
fixation levels off with saturation of the available sites in
the fibre.
Dye recipes formulated to the same visual deep shade has
indicated a reduction in quantity of dye required by the Remazol
Ultra RGB combination compared with commodity dyes approaching ~
50% Remazol Ultra RGB dyes demonstrate outstanding buildup and
tinctorial value by exhaust, cold pad batch and continuous
application methods to achieve deep shades from a lower
concentration of dyes and chemicals than is currently available
from competitive systems.
In exhaust application the electrolyte required is dependent
on the percentage of reactive dye applied in order to neutralise
the negative ions when alkali is added to effect the dye-fibre
fixation stage. The electrolyte concentration used for the
application of Remazol Ultra RGB dyes may be reduced by up to
40% compared with similar visual depth shades dyed with lower
efficiency commodity dyes. By forming the dye-fibre covalent
bonds at the steep part of the fixation curve, the amount of dye
hydrolysate formed in competition with water is reduced. This
contributes to a saving in water usage during washing off and a
significant reduction in total colour loading of the effluent.
The Diagram 3 illustrates the reduction in quantity of dye
required by the Remazol Ultra RGB combination compared with
commodity dyes approaching ~ 50%. The figures are derived from a
model small/medium sized dye house operating 50 weeks per year
and indicate the dye applied and hydrolysed dye discharged on an
annual basis calculated for both unmercerised cotton and Tencel®
A100 lyocell fibre in knitted fabric constructions.
|
Diagram 3: Dye
Consumed in tonnes
Dye Consumed in tonnes
 |
Colour in effluent
The unfixed colour removal in the model was calculated from
controlled dyeings, and the optical density of total colour to
be removed and discharged in effluent was measured with the
following calculated results:
|
Diagram 4: Dye
released in tonnes
Dye released in tonnes
 |
Impact on effluent loading
As an illustration of the impact on the dye house effluent
load we have taken the above dye house model processing
byexhaust application on knitted cotton interlock and Tencel
A100 using an overflow jet at 10 : 1 Liquor Ratio and a
carryover of liquor 300% between drain and fill baths. A typical
procedure uses three baths for preparation/rinsing of cotton,
two baths for preparation/rinsing of Tencel, one bath for dyeing
each fibre, and five baths for the rinsing/ soaping stages of
cotton and four rinsing/soaping stages for Tencel A100 giving a
total water consumption of ~ 66 litres per kilo of cotton fabric
and ~ 52 litres per kilo of Tencel respectively.
Chemical oxygen demand
Diagram 5 illustrates COD values normalised to one litre of
solution of the different fibres and dyes. If the fixation yield
is not optimal (illustrated by commodity ternary) the remaining
colour in the exhaust dye bath produces a high COD.
|
Diagram 5: COD
in mg/l
(Normalised to one litre of solution )
COD in mg/l
 |
Reduction in total dissolved solids
Electrolyte consumption largely contributes to the TDS
loading which is significantly reduced by use of the speciality
Remazol Ultra RGB technology compared to use of commodity dyes
particularly in deep shades, and can be further reduced by the
use of Tencel A100 compared with unmercerised cotton.
|
Diagram 6: Salt
Consumed in tonnes
Salt Consumed in tonnes
 |
3. Exhaust dyeing of polyester fibre
with disperse dyes
Due to limited availability of clean water and the ever
increasing cost of oil-derived raw materials, polyester fiber
production which is growing at a rapid pace has a considerable
environmental footprint. Hence, we need to minimize the
resources used for the coloration of polyester fibers
irrespective of whether the fiber is virgin or recycled. In a
brochure published in 2008 DyStar identified ways of reducing
resource use in exhaust dyeing of polyester fiber using Dianix
disperse dyes and Sera processing auxiliaries by the intelligent
application of process optimization software (Optidye P).
Looking at the two primary concerns in dyeing processes, namely
energy and water use the following minimization options were
identified:
Energy saving options can best be
achieved through:
- Frequency-regulated motors for reels and pumps
- Optimized dyeing processes and temperature / time
optimization
- Compatible, level-dyeing dyes for reliable dyeing
- High Right-First-Time performance (RFT)
- Heat recovery from hot discharge liquors
- Low liquor ratio
Water saving can best be achieved
through:
- Optimized machinery loading.
- Lowest possible liquor ratio.
- Combined washing and dyeing processes.
- Optimized rinsing processes.
- Reuse of rinsing baths.
- Compatible, level-dyeing dyes for reliable dyeing.
By using DyStar Dianix “green” dye selection and tailored
Sera process auxiliaries in combination with DyStar’s Optidye
PES program the following benefits can be achieved: also see
Diagram 7 on the next page:
- High reproducibility (RFT)
- Level dyeing
- Energy saving
- Reduction of water
- Reduction of dyes/auxiliaries cost
- Increased productivity
- High utilization of capital intensive machinery
- Reduced load on effluent
DyStar continues to develop new, innovative products which
have reduced impact on the environment. One such example
introduced in 2009 is Dianix Yellow Brown S-4R 150%, which is
designed to comply with ll RSL’s and ecological requirements of
major brands, retailers and independent ecolabels as an
alternative to the old commodity dye C.I.Disperse Orange 30.
The benefits of this integrated approach to dye and auxiliary
selection in combination with sophisticated process control can
be seen from the Diagram 8 & 9.

The optimized process using DyStar products and process
technology leads to the following benefits (calculated using
ABACUS® - a unique process evaluation program from DyStar
Textile Services):
- 43% Electricity
- 46% Steam
- 50% Water
- 39% Process time
- 38% cost in total
- 58% increase in production.
Conclusion
Best Available Technology for the coloration process through
the use of higher strength and build-up Remazol® Ultra RGB
reactive dyes particularly for deep shades and Levafix® CA dyes
for pale to medium shades, will contribute to reduced color in
effluent, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Total Dissolved
Solids (TDS) compared with commodity reactive dyes and
represents the preferred technology in markets where
environmental restrictions are required to be met. Similarly, by
using DyStar Dianix “green” dye selection and tailored Sera
process auxiliaries in combination with DyStar’s Optidye PES
program great savings on resources can be achieved and
environmental restrictions can be met. If you wish to know more
about DyStar efforts in sustainable textile processing, Please
visit us at www.dystar.com.
|