April - 2010
 

 

Enter your keyword or phrase to search PTJ


 
 


Optimizing reduced energy resources to meet finishing requirements
by Dipl.-Ing Kurt van Wersch, A. Monforts Textilmaschinen GmbH & Co. KG, Monchengladbach (Germany).

1. Abstract

Energy utilization in traditional finishing processes has to be optimized through the use of innovative technologies. This article describes how energy costs are incurred and how with simple means and methods maximum energy utilization can be achieved through the use of innovative technologies in traditional finishing processes. Dryer configurations, minimum application processes, measuring and control technology and fabric examples are described.

2.  Introduction

Discussing dwindling resources is no longer relevant today. No matter how alternative energies are generated, we have to use less energy more effectively.

The parliamentary State Secretary at the German Federal Ministry for Economics and Technology, Dagmar Wöhrl, said during the opening of a congress last year: “Energy is the motor for economic growth and development worldwide. The conservative use of energy and raw materials is not only a major factor for climate protection, but also and more particularly, an important competitive advantage for companies and national economies. Using resources efficiently allows you to produce more cost-effectively than the competition.

The awareness that the best energy is the energy that is not used is gaining more and more significance, particularly in the light of the ever-increasing energy and raw material prices.”

3. Where do costs occur, and how can they be measured?

If we consider the stenter as one of the main driers used in textile finishing, then certain demands are made on this drier and its configuration.

Modern stenters today should

  • Have a high drying capacity.
  • Have good insulation.
  • Have variable-frequency circulating air fans.
  • Have variable-frequency exhaust air fans.
  • Be equipped with high-efficiency motors for fans, drives and auxiliary motors.
  • Have long-term lubrication for the chain and require minimum maintenance.
  • Be equipped with measuring, control and regulating elements
  • Have a heat recovery system.
  • If necessary, have an exhaust air scrubber, and
  • Have upline facilities to permit universal application.


(Fig.1)

If your stenter meets these requirements, you have already taken the first step in the right direction. If we now consider the classic stenter drying process [Fig. 1], we can see here how much heat energy is required to dry a damp textile.

The damp textile web enters the stenter at production speed and is heated up. The water is vaporized and evaporates. The dried textile leaves the stenter with a certain residual moisture content and at a certain temperature.

The evaporated water is absorbed by the circulating air (=energy medium). Part of this moist air is drawn out of the machine as exhaust air and is replaced by fresh air. This fresh air has to be heated to drying temperature. The energy required to evaporate the water, heat up the fresh air and compensate the losses is supplied to the machine by the heater with the circulating air serving as energy medium. A small part of the energy is normally fed into the system by the rotating fan blades of the circulating air fans.

This can be expressed by the following formula [1]:

The process heat flow and the heat flow to heat up the fresh air are the most significant elements in the drying process. The importance of the heat flow for heating up the fresh air has already been described many times, so that here reference is made merely to citations [2-4] on the above subject.

The process heat flow is here the most important heat flow for which energy has to be input.

The specific energy consumption for each application can then be calculated using these formulae.

From these calculation bases it is possible to determine the specific energy consumption per kg textile during the drying process in the stenter as a function of the water volume to be evaporated (the parameter is the drying temperature). [Fig. 2]


[Fig. 2]

This specific energy consumption holds true for 100% Co, 200 g/m², 1.50 m wide.

tDü = 150°C, xD = 15 Vol%
Example 1       f1 = 70% initial moisture content.
                         f2 = 8% residual moisture content.
                         qT 2400 kJ/kg textile.

Example 2       f1 = 40% initial moisture content.
                        f2 = 8% residual moisture content.
                        qT 1250 kJ/kg textile

This then gives an hourly energy consumption during the drying process of

The enormous influence of the initial moisture content on the drying process is shown here again from a different perspective for emphasis.


[Fig. 3] shows the effect of a variation in the initial
moisture content.

[Fig. 3] shows the effect of a variation in the initial moisture content. Starting point here is 70%. A reduction in the initial moisture content results in an increase in the production speed and a reduction in the energy consumption and production costs. An increase naturally results in the opposite effect. Overall costs and thermal energy have practically the same percentage relative deviation. In summary this means first of all: The greatest contribution to energy savings is made by a reduction in the initial moisture content. Wherever possible, alternative liquor application systems should be employed. The liquor application should be as low as possible, but as high as necessary.

4. Examples of cost reductions during the drying process to suit your needs

 In this example, only step 1 is considered, as step 2 is a process without water evaporation.

Drying process 1: Classic
Drying process 2: Reduced initial moisture content
Drying process 3: Reduced initial moisture content and modified machine setting.

(Δf = 19%) Additional costs for drying 73,022 EUR/year (better than 180,000 EUR softener loss).


[Fig. 4] shows the range configuration for
 the wet-in-wet process.


[Fig. 5] shows a soft-coating production range.


[Fig. 6] shows a stenter inlet section with various upline elements.

(Δf = 6%) Additional costs for drying 35,402 EUR/year.

5. Final considerations

This article is intended to show where the problems lie during drying, and how maximum energy utilization can be achieved with simple means and methods through the use of innovative technologies in traditional finishing processes.  Energy efficiency is a step in the right direction. What can be avoided doesn’t need to be disposed of, and what isn’t applied doesn’t need to be dried.

Our motto is “Put need to your benefit”.

Redesign dryers electrically (use of: frequency controllers, high-efficiency motors, measuring instruments). Reconcile economy and ecology (use affordable technology to reduce energy consumption and costs, reduce the waste water).

Use our resources conservatively, because our children's children will also need energy.

Bibliography

  1. R. Fischer: On the energetic evaluation of stenters and the corresponding thermal processes, VTCC Seminars 1994, Order No. 18
  2. M. Pabst, K. van Wersch. Machine engineering implementation of the drying pretreatment, VTCC Seminars 1981, Order No. 8
  3. K. van Wersch            : Understanding and controlling drying processes, Paper for the University of the Lower Rhine on 25.05.2005, Presentation at VDTF Further Training Seminars
  4. K. van Wersch            : The use of steam/air mixtures in textile finishing], ITB-International Textile Bulletin 2/2004 and 4/2004.
 
Copyright 2010 Ptj.com.pk Entries (RSS)  Design: PTJ Graphics