Stitching thread parameters and garment
production: A Proven Link
by Mushtaq Mangat.
|
This study has been
conducted to identify the association between thread
parameters and garment production. For this purpose, five
trials in different mills were conducted by using stitching
threads of different qualities and finally it was concluded
that there is a strong association between the thread
parameters and garment production. It was found that on
average, there is an increase of 25% in garment production
by using better quality thread. Data results reveal that
during stitching process, stitching thread breakage has a
strong link with the production of garments. Stitching
operator has to stop machine and wastes time in rethreading
of machine. Breakage of stitching thread is mainly due to
faults in stitching thread. There is a long list of faults
in stitching thread. However, major faults are thick and
thin places, neps, and knots.
Keywords: Stitching thread, garment production,
thread count, thread imperfection number |
Introduction
Sewing is a process in which cut pieces are put together and
joined with the help of thread. For this purpose, stitching
machines are used. In last few decades, there is a huge change
in the machine speed. Change in machine speed demands a thread
of very high strength, low thick and thin places, smooth
surface, no hairiness, no knots, and less count variation.
Conversely, end user of garment needs a clean stitch line, fewer
thread breaks, high grip of pieces of fabric, and closed
stitches. Stitching thread manufacturing is an ancillary
industry of garment manufacturing since it is one of the basic
requirements of garment manufactures. Selection of stitching
thread depends upon many factors such as; quality and
availability of stitching thread, credit facilities, prices,
etc. The garment manufactures often complain about low
production and attribute poor performance of stitching thread as
one of the main factors.
There are numerous kinds of stitching threads. It all depends
upon the requirements of the garment manufacturer, particularly
on the type of fabric, which is to be joined. There is a long
list of different fibres, which are used to make stitching
thread. Nevertheless, the most common is cotton and polyester.
There are many factors to judge the quality parameters to assess
the performance of stitching thread. J & P Coats has adopted the
following quality parameters to judge the suitability and worth
of stitching thread:
|
Table 1:
Performance of stitching thread and its parameters in a
knitted garment manufacturing facility. |
| |
Stitching Threads Performance |
Thread Parameters |
| |
Stitching Thread
|
Stitching Thread
|
Description |
Stitching Thread
|
Stitching Thread
|
| Thread Description |
40/2 |
40/2 |
Actual Count
(Ne ) |
42.63/3 |
44.74/3 |
| Thread Cost of
Thread Per Garment (US $) |
0.023 |
0.033 |
d.tex |
138x3 |
132x3 |
Additional Cost Per
Garment
(US $) |
0.010 |
Strength (cN) |
1213 |
1220 |
| Thread Breakage per
8 Hrs |
149 |
4 |
Tenacity
(cN / tex ) |
29.20 |
30.81 |
| Decrease in Thread
Breaking by using Thread B |
145 |
|
Friction / Variation |
124.114 |
12/110 |
| Decrease in Thread
Breaking by using Thread B ( % ) |
97.31 |
Uptake % |
7.65 |
3.30 |
| Production Per 8 Hrs |
312 |
400 |
Sew
able (FTK) |
75.00 |
10.18 |
| Increase in Garment
Production |
88 |
Non
Sew able (FTK) |
37.50 |
8.06 |
| Garment Production
Increase % |
27.88 |
Total
Faults |
112.5 |
18.24 |
|

Diagram 1: Association between
thread breakage, number of faults and garment production
in a knitted garments manufacturing facility. |
- Actual Count.
- Strength (cN).
- Tenacity (cN/textile).
- Friction/Variation.
- Uptake %.
- Sewable faults performance Kilometer.
- Sewable faults performance Kilometer.
- Total Faults.
These factors play a significant role in the performance of
stitching thread. Generally, people are well aware about the
role of stitching thread in the production of garments. However,
which parameter plays crucial role in the performance of
stitching thread needs to be evaluated. In this study, our
purpose is to develop an association between performance of
stitching thread and most significant stitching thread
characteristics.
|
Table 2: Performance of stitching
thread and its parameters in a denim apparel and clothing
manufacturing Facility |
| |
Stitching Threads Performance |
Thread Parameters |
| |
Stitching Thread
|
Stitching Thread
|
Description |
Stitching Thread
|
Stitching Thread
|
| Thread
Count claimed by manufacturer |
20/2 |
20/2 |
Actual Count
( Ne ) |
17.93/2 |
18.67/2 |
Thread
Cost of Thread Per Garment
(US $) |
0.073 |
0.202 |
d.tex |
329x2 |
316x2 |
Additional Cost Per Garment
(US $) |
0.129 |
Strength (cN) |
2097 |
2275 |
Thread
Breakage per
8 Hrs |
1147 |
11 |
Tenacity
(cN / tex ) |
31.83 |
35.96 |
| Decrease
in Thread Breaking by using Thread B |
1136 |
|
Friction /ariation |
163/104 |
107/47 |
Decrease
in Thread Breaking by Using Thread
B ( % ) |
99.04 |
Uptake % |
0.70 |
5.07 |
Production Per
8 Hrs |
1948 |
2358 |
Sewable (FTK) |
20.41 |
4.24 |
| Increase
in Garment Production |
410 |
Non Sewable (FTK) |
13.61 |
3.01 |
| Garment
Production Increase % |
21.04 |
Total Faults |
34.02 |
7.25 |
|

Diagram 2: Association between
thread breakage, number of faults and garment production
in a denim apparel and clothing manufacturing mill. |
Research methodology
Before finalizing the research methodology, the users of
stitching thread were contacted in order to seek their guidance
regarding stitching thread performance. After consulting thread
manufacturers and garment producers, we finalized the following
methods to conduct this research:
- Selection of stitching hall where a certain product is
being sewn and firm has a plan to stitch same garment minimum
for next one week;
- We selected stitching thread from J&P Coats as benchmark
and its performance was compared with other brands, which were
used by these firms, where we conducted trials;
- Garment producing companies agreed to run for three
consecutive days the brand they are using and for next three
consecutive days stitching thread recommended by J&P Coats;
- The production and thread breakage frequency was observed,
keeping all other variables constant, like, number of
machines, group of operators, product description, working
environment (hall temperature, level of humidity, noise level
etc);
- The production and thread breakage data of six working
days was observed. It was divided into two groups; three days
with the brand which is already under use (Thread a) and three
days with J & P Coats brand (Thread b);
- After completion of trials, the testing of both brands to
measure the following parameters was observed as follows.
I. Actual Count.
II. Strength (cN).
III. Tenacity (cN/textile).
IV. Friction/Variation.
V. Uptake %.
VI. Sewable faults performance Kilometer.
VII. Sewable faults performance Kilometer.
VIII. Total Faults.
7. All data was analyzed with
the help of SPSS software.
Data collection
Five firms producing knitted garments, fitted bed sheets,
denim shirts, and trousers were selected for trials. These firms
were using different threads provided by local manufacturers.
|
Table 3:
Performance of stitching thread and its parameters in a
fitted bed sheets stitching facility |
| |
Stitching Threads Performance |
Thread Parameters |
| |
Stitching Thread
|
Stitching Thread
|
Description |
Stitching Thread
|
Stitching Thread
|
| Thread
Count Claimed by Manufacturer |
50/3 |
50/3 |
Actual Ne |
43.88/3 |
46.38/3 |
| Thread
Cost of Thread Per Garment (US$) |
0.022 |
0.045 |
Actual d.tex |
134x3 |
127x3 |
|
Additional Cost Per Garment (US$) |
0.023 |
Strength (cN) |
1209 |
1303 |
| Thread
Breakage per 8 Hrs |
1874 |
16 |
Tenacity (cN / tex ) |
29.95 |
34.11 |
| Decrease
in Thread Breaking by Using Thread B |
1858 |
|
Friction/Variation |
141/32 |
105/54 |
| Decrease
in Thread Breaking by Using Thread B (%) |
99.15 |
Uptake % |
2.30 |
3.33 |
Production Per
8 Hrs |
2593 |
3200 |
Sew able (FTK) |
14.69 |
2.61 |
| Increase
in Garment Production |
607 |
Non Sew able (FTK |
8.35 |
3.10 |
| Garment
Production Increase % |
23.40 |
|
Total Faults |
23.04 |
5.71 |
|

Diagram 3: Association between
thread breakage, number of faults and garment production
in a fitted bed sheet manufacturing facility. |
Following procedure was adopted to conduct trials:
- Selection of one production hall to conduct the trial;
- Production and breakage of thread during stitching
monitored for first three days of week, while they were using
thread supplied by a local manufacturers.
- Production and breakage of thread during stitching was
monitored for rest of three days of week, while they were
using thread which was provided by J&P Coats.
- Both types of stitching thread were tested to check their,
actual count, strength, friction and faults.
- After completion of trials, data was analyzed with the
help of SPSS software.
Data analysis
Data was summarized and an effort was made to present
relationship among the production, number of faults and thread
breakage. The tables and diagrams are self-explanatory and
provide enough evidence to reach at a conclusion.
|
Table 4:
Performance of Stitching Thread and its Parameters in a
Knitted Garment Manufacturing Mill |
|
Stitching Threads Performance |
Thread Parameters |
|
Stitching Thread
|
Stitching Thread
|
Description |
Stitching Thread
|
Stitching Thread |
| Thread
Count Claimed by Manufacturer |
50/3 |
25/2 |
Actual Ne |
46.13/3 |
25.78/2 |
| Thread
Cost of Thread Per Garment (US $) |
0.106 |
0.266 |
Actual d.tex |
128x3 |
229x2 |
Additional Cost Per Garment
(US $) |
0.0160 |
|
Strength (cN) |
1320 |
1945 |
Thread
Breakage per
8 Hrs |
394 |
16 |
Tenacity (cN / tex ) |
34.38 |
42.47 |
| Decrease
in Thread Breaking by Using Thread B |
378 |
|
Friction / Variation |
102/98 |
98/92 |
| Decrease
in Thread Breaking by Using Thread B ( % ) |
95.93 |
|
Uptake % |
5 |
5 |
|
Production Per 8 Hrs |
399 |
545 |
Sew able (FTK) |
4 |
1 |
| Increase
in Garment Production |
146 |
|
Non Sew able (FTK) |
4 |
3 |
| Garment
Production Increase % |
36.59 |
|
Total Faults |
8 |
4 |
|

Diagram 4: Association between thread breakage, number of
faults and garment production in a knitted garment
stitching facility. |
Discussion
Table 1 to 5 depict that approximately there is an average increase of 25% in
production of clothing. For this additional production, firms
had to bear additional cost in shape of expenses of stitching
thread. This additional cost is quite negligible when it is
compared with the total cost of production. Other than this
minor cost, firms did not bear any additional expenses. There is
no increase of overhead expenses. It means that firms can
increase their production up to 25% without adding any machine,
operator, or working for long hours. Tables further show that
there is a significant difference in the parameters of stitching
thread manufactured by different firms. It is clear from the
tables that major differences are in the following areas:
- Strength of stitching thread.
- Tenacity.
- Lubrication.
- Sewable faults.
- Nonsewn able.
|
Table 5:
Performance of Stitching Thread and its Parameters in a
Denim Trouser Manufacturing Mill |
| |
Stitching Threads Performance |
Thread Parameters |
| |
Stitching Thread
|
Stitching Thread
|
Description |
Stitching Thread
|
Stitching Thread |
| Thread
Count Claimed by Manufacturer |
20/4 |
20/4 |
Actual Ne |
16.41/4 |
18.40/4 |
| Thread
Cost of Thread Per Garment (US $) |
0.119 |
0.266 |
Actual d.tex |
359.86x4 |
320.95x4 |
Additional Cost Per Garment
(US $) |
0.047 |
|
Strength (cN) |
4561 |
4603 |
| Thread
Breakage per 8 Hrs |
411 |
22 |
Tenacity
(cN / tex) |
31.69 |
35.85 |
| Decrease
in Thread Breaking by Using Thread B |
389 |
|
Friction / Variation |
154/81 |
113/50 |
| Decrease
in Thread Breaking by Using Thread B ( % ) |
94.64 |
|
Uptake % |
2.7 |
4.39 |
|
Production Per 8 Hrs |
330 |
397 |
Sew able (FTK) |
26.3 |
3.65 |
| Increase
in Garment Production |
67 |
|
Non Sew able (FTK) |
66.65 |
3.14 |
| Garment
Production Increase % |
20.30 |
|
Total Faults |
92.95 |
6.79 |
|

Diagram 5: Association between
thread breakage, number of faults and garment production
at denim trouser stitching facility. |
Data provides evidence that for better stitching thread, one
has to improve the strength of yarn and effort to have minimum
sewable and non-sew able faults in stitching thread. By having
such type of yarn,
there are less chances of stitching thread breakage during
stitching process. Consequently, there are bright chances that
firms can have approximately 25% extra production, without
additional sewing machines, increase in number of workers,
additional working place and fixed cost. Nevertheless, there is
a minor increase in the cost of stitching thread. In addition to
increase in production, firms can have other benefits by using
quality-stitching thread. These includes, timely delivery of
goods, smooth and fine seams, better wages of workers (mostly
workers are working on piece rates), better stitch bursting
strength and finally higher profits.
Conclusion
Stitching thread is highly significant parameter for better productivity. It was
observed that many units do not consider it as one of important
factors, which has a strong association with production. They
place emphasis on increased production by adding more machines,
whereas, it is possible to increase production up to 25%, just
by using the right stitching thread. Although, stitching thread
with low count variation, low number of faults and of high
strength is costly, but detailed analysis proves that at the end
of the day, additional costs pay additional benefits. There is a
huge difference in benefits and cost. Benefits are highter than
the additional cost. It is recommended that before using
stitching thread, firms should get the stitching thread tested
and compare their results in order to increase production
efficiency.
|