Cluster Formation
in the Textile Industries of Europe
by Dr. H.R. Sheikh, Professor Emeritus, Textile
Institute of Pakistan |
 |
|
Cluster formation is a modern trend in
the textile industries of developed countries of U.S.A.,
Europe and U.K. A Cluster is defined as a group of
companies involved in a common activity of manufacturing
industrial products such as textile and clothing on the
basis of collaboration and competition. Strategic Alliance
is also another from of ‘Cluster’ which provides
opportunity to small and large firms to develop
cooperative relationships. F. Dadashian, M. Fazal Zarandi
and S. Shakibfar discussed strategic alliances. A Palmer
and J.T. Williams reported the main features of the
European textile industry in their papers presented at The
Textile Institute 85th World Conference was held on
Colombo, Sri Lanka from 1st to 3rd March, 2007. |
Mr. Trevor Rowe of the University of Bolton presented results
of his seven years research work concerning the competitiveness
of the textile and clothing sectors of Turkey and U.K. during
his lecture in Karachi, at the Sheraton Hotel on 16th April,
2007. The lecture was arranged by Textile Institute of Pakistan
in co-sponsorship with the University of Management and
Technology (UMT) Lahore. The views expressed by these experts
are briefly reported below
1. Strategic Alliances
By strategic alliances cooperating firms pool their
resources, capabilities and competencies to pursue mutual
interests in developing, manufacturing or distribution of goods
and services. Effective alliances lead to growth and
profitability in the domestic as well as global markets. On the
basis of these alliances, the collaborating firms can face the
challenge of low cost imports adequately. A typical strategic
alliance comprises of three stages:
1. Formation: Identification of opportunities,
negotiation of objectives, commitment of organization and
financial resources, establishment and activation of operational
infrastructure.
2. Operation: Progress and growth of collaborative
operational activities to face unanticipated challenges and
emerging market conditions.
3. Finalisation: Prompted by the initial conditions
of agreement.
1.1. Success Factors
Following kinds of success factors are associated with the
formation of strategic alliances:
1. The alliance partners benefit from economies of
scale of static and dynamic type.
2. Quick and easy accesses to knowledge and market
conditions accrue to start-up partner.
3. Development of new kinds of products and
technologies becomes possible at reduced risk and capital cost.
4. Both partners acquire capability of influencing
structure of market competition.
In consequence of continuously changing technological
environments the firms realize that reliance on internal
development is no longer sufficient to deal with the emerging
conditions. The use of strategic alliances allows them to
increase their flexibility and tap into other company’s
technological resources. Thus, they learn and acquire from each
other technologies, skills, and knowledge not available within
their own organistions.
1.2. Structure of Strategic Alliances
Strategic Alliances may be vertical or horizontal. Partners
involved in different manufacturing stages, e.g., fibre
manufacture and textile manufacture form vertical alliances. On
the other hand yarn manufacturer, fabric manufacturer and wet
processor enter into horizontal alliances.
1.3. Alliance Partner Selection
Alliance Partner selection must be done in a transparent
manner and right partner should be attracted. The value systems
of partners must be aligned. Furthermore, delegation of decision
rights versus the agency costs in maintaining the integrity of
alliance and brand reputation must be on the basis of consensus
between partners. Careful strategic planning and good
partnership preparation are essential for alliance success.
2. European Textile Industry
The textile and clothing sector contributes 4% of European
Union (EU) manufacturing production and employs more than 2.3
million workers with important regional concentrations. The
value-added production has steadily declined since 1995 @ 1.2%
per annum and employment by 3%. However, the productivity gains
rate stands at 2% per annum. The total turn over of 25 member EU
is estimated at dollar 215 billion. High quality technical,
aesthetic and fashion related products, development of highly
demanded brands along with speed, flexible and reliable delivery
are competitive advantages of EU production.
2.1. Technical Textiles
In the textile and clothing sectors 30% of the small and
medium size companies (SMES) within EU closed between 2003 and
2005. Mass productions of textiles and clothing caused by
globalised large scale retail operations are coming to end in
Western Europe and U.S.A. Innovative companies are shifting to
the manufacture of technical textiles in order to move forward
in a more competitive world. Approximately 190,000 SMES in the
textile and clothing sector have realized that their survival
depends on adopting innovative products and availing
opportunities to work with other sectors.
The trend from commodity items to higher value industrial
fabrics and technical textile is growing across Western Europe.
A whole range of highly effective technologies for
functionalisation of fibre and textile surfaces have been
developed recently such as nanotechnology, polymeric coatings,
micro-encapsulation, enzyme, plasma, laser, ultra-sound and
ultraviolet treatments, spraying and ink-jet printing
techniques. By using the new processes and technologies European
textiles and clothing companies can develop and produce highly
specialized, multi-functional fibre and textile based materials
and products which are aimed at niche market segments and
consequently escape fierce price competition. Strategic Alliance
partners and members of ‘Clusters’ can develop these
capabilities much faster and steer clear of the challenge of low
cost imports from developing countries.
3. Textile Industries of Turkey and U.K
Mr. Trevor Rowe examined the competitiveness of textile and
clothing sectors of Turkey and U.K. during seven years of
research work funded by the E.U. Some of the findings of the
studies are reported on the next page:
3.1. Turkish Textile Industry
The small and medium enterprise category (SME) comprises of
40,000 to 50,000 companies in the Turkish Textile Industry which
is the backbone of Turkish economy. SME’S in Turkey contribute
10% to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and account for 17.50%
of the industrial production. The main advantages enjoyed by the
Turkish textile and clothing sector are:
- Low labour cost and skilled work force.
- Availability of cheap raw-materials
- Proximity to Europe.
Turkish textile and clothing sector is the second largest
supplier to the E.U. which is its main market. China has always
been perceived as a threat to Turkey on account of low cost and
competitive imports in to the traditional market for the Turkish
textile and clothing products.
3.2. Textile Industry of U.K.
After the commencement of WTO with effect from 1st January,
2005 many textile companies dropped apparel manufacture and
started production of Technical Textiles. NW England has the
largest concentration of Technical Textiles and Composite
manufacturing units. The number of such companies is about 500.
They have shifted from traditional textile products to the
manufacture of Aerospace Textiles and textile based substrates.
There are about 5000 companies in NW England in the Textile and
Clothing Sector which are now developing ‘Composites’.
These companies are in the SME category. About 99% of the
companies employ less than 250 workers and about 75% less than
10 workers. Four large universities of NW England are working
with companies and providing expertise, research facilities,
consultancy, product development and advisory services. In the
late 1990’s the Regional Development Agency supported a cluster
development strategy for the Textile Sector. The main object of
the strategy is to find ways and means of improving the
competitiveness of the Textile Sector in the global market.
3.3. Formation of Clusters
E.U. has started two projects to facilitate the formation of
clusters as follows:
1. Fashion and Textile Cluster (FTC) in Istanbul,
Turkey.
2. New Textile Network in NW England.
E.U. is providing funds for both the above mentioned
projects. Approximate cost of FTC is £ 15- million. It is a long
term project and will be completed in 10 years. The estimated
cost of the NW Textile Network in NW England is Euro 12 million
and it will be completed in a period of two years.
4. Innotex Project
Innotex is a part of European Innova Project. It is designed
to evaluate regional clustering, best practice and support
mechanisms in the Technical Textiles Sector. Initially clusters
of following four complementary member states have been included
in the study:
1. Leicestershire, U.K.
2. Aragon Region of Spain
3. Danish Marine Cluster
4. Estonia
4.1. SWOT Analysis and Innovation
SWOT analysis was carried out the basis of information
provided by the project partners. This was compared with the
performance of a range of companies within the region on the
basis of a sample survey. The findings identified best practices
and opportunities for funding, training, supply chain links,
innovative ideas, entrepreneurship and market diversification.
Innotex Project aims to build a platform for transfer of
knowledge and innovation on the basis of comparison of its work
with other EU sponsored projects and organizations.
4.2. Dissemination of Information
Innotex Project arranges workshops, exchange visits, seminars
and conferences regularly to disseminate in formations and
knowledge gained to maximum number of companies involved in the
technical textiles sectors and its support bodies to the extent
possible. A European database will be available on the Innova
Website produces during the 30th month of Innotex Project ending
on April, 2008. This will be accessible to potential customers
to search for suppliers on a Europe wide basis strengthening the
image of the industry.
Acknowledgement
Assistance received from M/S. Moiz Iqbal, Asim Ali Khan and
Suleman Farooq (Find year students of TIP) during preparation of
the paper is gratefully acknowledged.
|