|
Pakistani apparel industry is currently under
immense pressure from the US and European buyers to comply
with social and legal standards. Instead of fruitless discussions
if it is a ploy for non-tariff barriers against developing
countries, or a genuine concern for workers and society, exporters
should plan to become socially compliant due to our own moral,
legal and economical reasons.
Social Compliance Audits
The recent wave of social compliance audits
in our factories is only a glimpse of what lies ahead in the
year 2005 onward. During last one and a half year, we have
witnessed admin and other compliance personnel in our production
facilities endlessly preparing for compliance audits, one
after another.
In last one month alone, we handled audits from
about twelve different buyers in our unit in Lahore, some
of them quite inconsistent in their demands and expectations.
We had to prepare lengthy reports, and suffered interruptions
in production due to numerous confidential interviews, questionnaires,
and safety rehearsals. This,alongwith other out of routine
administrative drill to 'satisfy' our foreign buyers, was
both tough and costly. We accepted this, as we do not have
many alternatives available. In a quota-free regime, price,
quality and shorter production cycle is not the only recipe
for success, there is yet another key to survival i.e. social
compliance.
Thus there is a greater need than ever for each
organization to assess its capability and gaps in terms of
social and legal compliance. This, followed by a comprehensive
corrective action, and review plan is the only short cut to
remain viable in the post-2005 era.
In the following lines, we have introduced the
concept of worldwide responsible apparel production (WRAP)
as a tool to benchmark our social compliance standards, and
how this certification can help our garments industry cope
with the year 2005 challenge.
What is WRAP?
The worldwide responsible apparel production
(WRAP) is an initiative of American Apparel Manufacturing
Association in response to public and customers' concerns
in US about working conditions in apparel manufacturing factories.
It competes with other social compliance programs including
Fair Labour Association (FLA), SA 8000 and the Workers Rights
Consortium (WRC).
Unlike Fair Labour Association (initiated by the US President
in 1998), WRAP is an association based and originally sponsored
by American Apparel Manufacturing Association, and now endorsed
by a large number of apparel producing bodies around the world.
Instead of brand certification, it is a factory-based program,
and resembles SA8000 in this aspect. Under this program, retailers
can encourage or even require their suppliers to be compliant
with WRAP principles to qualify for certification. A WRAP
certified factory is attractive for current and prospective
buyers, as they can buy products with assurance that certain
level of ethical and legal work practice is being adhered
to in that factory.
WRAP was initiated in 1997 by a task group of
then American Apparel Manufacturers Association, now known
as American Apparel and Footwear Manufacturers Association
(AAFA). The AAFA claims to be the largest sewn products trade
association in the United States with over 85% of sewn products
sold at wholesale in the USA. In 2000, WRAP became an independent
not-for-profit agency with an autonomous board of directors.
By November 2003, WRAP had over 700 international manufacturers
with more than 1300 participating factories in the program
and had certified 570 factories. Certifications are usually
valid for a period of one year, and all participating factories
may be inspected at any time to ensure ongoing compliance.
WRAP aims to achieve social compliance objective
without damaging the business competitiveness of participants.
This is supported by satisfaction-contribution equilibrium
theory, which is vital for all external actors as well so
as for business performance. If this equilibrium remains disturbed
with labour within the factory, disequilibria will prevail,
and it will be hard to compete in the external market. From
factory perspective, WRAP certification means that redundant
inspections can be done away with. One such certification
may hold good for a period of at least one year, and is a
comprehensive alternative to numerous brand based certifications
round the year. This results in saving of precious production
and support time, which is otherwise consumed by numerous
compliance audits. The brand-based audits may still remain
as a formal requirement (though for small buyers may be waived
off), but their stringent requirements, frequency of audits
and time consumption will drastically reduce for a WRAP certified
factory. Since 2001, Pakistani knitwear industry has faced
the brunt of a row of inspections that have kept administration,
human resource and other compliance staff busy alongwith unnecessary
extra-ordinary preparations, documentation, and interruptions
in production. WRAP certification will also ensure that only
consistent (and essentially steady) standards are followed
and observed in the factory. On the buyers' part, WRAP will
re-affirm their commitment to apply legal, ethical, and humane
standards of apparel production to any factory that produces
for their consumers.
WRAP process
WRAP process includes self-evaluation, independent
inspection, and the corrective action. This is followed by
final review by the WRAP board to make a decision about certification.
There are a number of accredited firms that perform on-site
evaluation in more than 70 countries across the world. Following
is a four-step process of certification under WRAP program:
· The factory will conduct a pre-certification
review to identify gaps to be addressed to comply with the
WRAP Principles.
· An accredited external monitor will
inspect the production factory to verify compliance. The monitor
will also evaluate if the factory has systems in place to
address other compliance-related.
· The WRAP certification agency will
review the factory's application, including the monitor's
report, and will then certify if the factory meets the WRAP
requirements.
· Finally, the WRAP certification agency
will determine about the frequency of renewal for certification
status.
WRAP principles
WRAP principles are twelve benchmarks to evaluate
ethical, legal and humane business practices in participating
factories, and are now widely supported in the world. Following
is a summary of WRAP principles:
1. Laws and Workplace Regulations: Compliance
with local laws and regulations.
2. Forced Labor: Prohibition of involuntary
or forced labor, indentured bonded or otherwise.
3. Child Labor: Prohibition of hiring under
the age of 14 or under the age interfering with compulsory
schooling, or under the minimum age established by law, whichever
is greater.
4. Harassment or Abuse: Provision of a work
environment, free of harassment, abuse or corporal punishment
in any form.
5. Compensation and Benefits: Payment of atleast
the minimum total compensation and benefits required by local
law.
6. Hours of Work: Hours worked each day, and
days worked each week, shall not exceed the local legal limitations.
Provision of at least one day-off in every seven-day period,
except as required to meet urgent business needs.
7. Discrimination: Apparel manufacturers will
employ, pay, promote, and terminate workers on the basis of
their ability to do the job, rather than on the basis of personal
characteristics or beliefs.
8. Health and Safety: Provision of a safe and
healthy work environment
9. Freedom of Association: Recognition and respect
for the employees' lawful right to free association, including
joining or not joining any association.
10. Environment: Compliance with local environment
rules, regulations and standards
11. Customs Compliance: Compliance with applicable
customs laws and, in particular will establish and maintain
programs to comply with customs laws regarding illegal transshipment
of apparel products.
12. Security of Shipments: Cooperation with
local, national and foreign customs and drug enforcement agencies
to guard against illegal shipments of drugs, and hazardous
material.
Means, not an end
WRAP is not a solution to all compliance related
problems. There are certain areas in which its standards have
been stated to be 'lenient' than ILO benchmarks e.g. hours
of work, freedom of association, and gender considerations.
Also WRAP certification may not absolve a factory of its requirement
to undergo brand-based audits. Yet this is a step in the right
direction, and can help our production facilities bring their
social and legal standards chiefly in line with the requirements
of our buyers.
Jawad S. Naqvi is a human resource practitioner
in Lahore and he can be reached at jawad@yahoo.com.
|